Zee News
July 5, 2024 · Legal Analysis
Navigating The Rapids: Understanding the 'Waterfall Mechanism' in Section 53 of IBC, 2016
Advocate Srijan Tiwari demystifies the priority waterfall for creditors in corporate insolvency liquidation — published in Zee News, July 5, 2024.
Read Original Article on Zee News ↗About This Publication
This article was authored by Advocate Srijan Tiwari and published in Zee News, one of India's largest national news channels and digital news platforms, on July 5, 2024. The article provides an in-depth explanation of Section 53 of the IBC — a provision critical for pharmaceutical companies that are creditors in insolvency proceedings.
What is the Waterfall Mechanism?
Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 establishes a strict priority order for the distribution of a company's assets during liquidation. Known as the "waterfall mechanism" for the sequential manner in which proceeds flow to different classes of creditors, this provision determines who gets paid first — and how much — when a company is wound up.
For pharmaceutical corporations, which often have complex creditor relationships including raw material suppliers, equipment lessors, and regulatory deposit obligations, understanding this priority order is essential for credit risk management and recovery strategy.
The Priority Waterfall Under Section 53
Insolvency Resolution Process Costs and Liquidation Costs
Paid first from the estate
Workmen Dues (past 24 months) and Secured Creditors
Pari passu — equal priority
Employee Wages and Provident Fund
For all other employees
Unsecured Financial Creditors
Typically banks and NBFCs without security
Government Dues
Taxes, duties, and regulatory fees
Remaining Secured Creditors
After enforcement of security interest
Equity Shareholders
Paid last — if any surplus remains
Relevance for Pharmaceutical Corporations
Pharmaceutical companies frequently appear as operational creditors in insolvency proceedings of their customers — hospitals, distributors, and retail pharmacy chains. Understanding their position in the Section 53 waterfall helps pharma companies assess recovery prospects and take proactive steps during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to maximise their recoveries.
Advocate Srijan Tiwari's cross-domain expertise in both pharmaceutical law and insolvency proceedings makes him uniquely positioned to advise pharmaceutical and cosmetics corporations on their creditor rights in insolvency situations — complementing his primary practice in drug law litigation.
Primary Practice: Drug & Cosmetics Law at Delhi High Court
Advocate Srijan Tiwari's core expertise is drug and cosmetics litigation — NSQ defence, CDSCO regulatory disputes, and pharmaceutical compliance at Delhi High Court. Contact for drug law matters: 9899966225
Publication Details
Related Drug Law Articles