SRIJAN TIWARI
Back to Media
ZN

Zee News

July 5, 2024 · Legal Analysis

Navigating The Rapids: Understanding the 'Waterfall Mechanism' in Section 53 of IBC, 2016

Advocate Srijan Tiwari demystifies the priority waterfall for creditors in corporate insolvency liquidation — published in Zee News, July 5, 2024.

Read Original Article on Zee News ↗

About This Publication

This article was authored by Advocate Srijan Tiwari and published in Zee News, one of India's largest national news channels and digital news platforms, on July 5, 2024. The article provides an in-depth explanation of Section 53 of the IBC — a provision critical for pharmaceutical companies that are creditors in insolvency proceedings.

What is the Waterfall Mechanism?

Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 establishes a strict priority order for the distribution of a company's assets during liquidation. Known as the "waterfall mechanism" for the sequential manner in which proceeds flow to different classes of creditors, this provision determines who gets paid first — and how much — when a company is wound up.

For pharmaceutical corporations, which often have complex creditor relationships including raw material suppliers, equipment lessors, and regulatory deposit obligations, understanding this priority order is essential for credit risk management and recovery strategy.

The Priority Waterfall Under Section 53

1st

Insolvency Resolution Process Costs and Liquidation Costs

Paid first from the estate

2nd

Workmen Dues (past 24 months) and Secured Creditors

Pari passu — equal priority

3rd

Employee Wages and Provident Fund

For all other employees

4th

Unsecured Financial Creditors

Typically banks and NBFCs without security

5th

Government Dues

Taxes, duties, and regulatory fees

6th

Remaining Secured Creditors

After enforcement of security interest

7th

Equity Shareholders

Paid last — if any surplus remains

Relevance for Pharmaceutical Corporations

Pharmaceutical companies frequently appear as operational creditors in insolvency proceedings of their customers — hospitals, distributors, and retail pharmacy chains. Understanding their position in the Section 53 waterfall helps pharma companies assess recovery prospects and take proactive steps during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to maximise their recoveries.

Advocate Srijan Tiwari's cross-domain expertise in both pharmaceutical law and insolvency proceedings makes him uniquely positioned to advise pharmaceutical and cosmetics corporations on their creditor rights in insolvency situations — complementing his primary practice in drug law litigation.

Primary Practice: Drug & Cosmetics Law at Delhi High Court

Advocate Srijan Tiwari's core expertise is drug and cosmetics litigation — NSQ defence, CDSCO regulatory disputes, and pharmaceutical compliance at Delhi High Court. Contact for drug law matters: 9899966225

Publication Details

Published InZee News
DateJuly 5, 2024
AuthorAdv. Srijan Tiwari
TypeLegal Analysis
TopicInsolvency Law
Read on Zee News ↗

Drug Law Consultation

NSQ defence · Pharma regulatory · Delhi High Court

WhatsApp Now